AI Landscape: Congress and the White House
June brought significant developments in federal AI policy, with new actions from both the White House and Congress that could shape how AI is developed, evaluated and deployed across sectors, including healthcare.
On June 2, President Trump signed the executive order Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security, representing one of the first instances in which the Trump Administration has called for direct federal oversight of AI companies. Under the voluntary framework, companies developing qualified frontier models would be asked to submit those systems to the federal government and trusted partners for review 30 days before public release. The order reflects growing bipartisan interest in balancing innovation with safeguards around security, reliability and public trust.
Soon after, Reps. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and Lori Trahan (D-MA) released their draft bill, the Great American Artificial Intelligence Act of 2026. Among numerous other provisions, the nearly 300-page proposal would establish the Center for AI Safety and Innovation within the National Institute of Standards and Technology as the primary federal body for AI oversight and authorize $100 million annually for the Center from 2027 through 2029.
The draft legislation also emphasizes interagency coordination, workforce development and the creation of national AI standards, all of which could have significant implications for how AI tools are evaluated and adopted in healthcare settings.
The draft is the first major congressional attempt to establish a comprehensive federal AI framework since the December 2024 Bipartisan House Task Force Report on Artificial Intelligence. However, the Obernolte-Trahan bill has already drawn criticism, particularly over its proposed three-year preemption of state AI laws. That debate highlights the growing tension between federal coordination and state-led regulation at a time when healthcare organizations, developers and policymakers are seeking clearer standards for the safe and effective use of AI.
Elections, Appropriations and Impact: GOP Primary Losses Reshape Senate Leadership Ahead of Midterms
Ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections, Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and John Cornyn (R-TX), have lost their primary elections, creating turnover in GOP leadership on health policy issues. Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, was defeated in Louisiana’s primary, while Cornyn, a longtime Senate leader and important bipartisan dealmaker, lost his runoff in Texas. These elections determine each party’s nominees for the November general election, which ultimately decides which party fills these seats in the 120th Congress beginning in January 2027.
The departures of Senators Cassidy and Cornyn are expected to shift the Republican delegation in Congress further rightward as the 2026 midterm elections intensify intra-party challenges. The losses will also create turnover in Senate committee leadership on key health policy issues and remove a seasoned negotiator from Senate leadership.
Cassidy’s departure, alongside Cornyn’s, could weaken bipartisan support for NIH and ARPA-H funding, raising new questions about the future of federal investment in biomedical research.